![]() ![]() I had harder time doing that with the Ravencroft piano then I did with the Pianoteq's pianos. Very similar to what I do when I play on and acoustic piano. I was able to make an intimate connection between my fingers and the sounds the keyboard was producing. The Pianoteq program was easily able to capture what I was trying to convey through my fingers as though the program was an extension of my thoughts. It was simply much easier to produce a clean "singing" line and subtle phrasing on Pianoteq 6 then it was to do the same on the Ravenscroft 275. The difference between the modeled pianos and the sampled Ravenscroft piano are night and day. My first impression just ignoring the quality and character of the piano sound itself. I can play some of the more advanced classical repertoire but I feel I still have more to learn and I still take lessons to improve myself. I've been told I have a good ear, and told I produce very good tone. I play regularly on acoustic grands including Steinways, Mason and Hamlin, Yamaha for over 35 years and own a Kawai RX-2 acoustic grand. ![]() I'm using a pair of Sennheiser HD497 headphones that are probably from the early 2000's but were top rated back in the days. My controller is a 15 year old RolandED PC-70 which is not weighted and only velocity sensitive. Igrand versus pianoteq 5 mac#I've loaded up both these programs on an i5 core mac mini with 8 GB ram and an SSD (solid state drive) I don't know if there are settings I should try to configure that could affect my opinions I've played around with the piano(s) on Pianoteq for about 20 minutes total and the Ravenscroft 275 on the VI Lab workstation for a total of about 10 minutes. I've only had these programs for a couple of days. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |